|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Fellowship Paper IMPLICATIONS OF THE REVOLUTION IN HOSPITAL ADVERTISING AN
EXAMINATION OF THE VARIED ROLES OF PUBLIC RELATIONS
A FELLOWSHIP PROJECT SUBMITTED BY Ned B. Barnett, APR May 1, 1984 Ned B. Barnett, APR
PREFACE—ABOUT THIS FELLOWSHIP PROJECT A revolution is taking place in hospital public relations, a revolution that reflects the changing nature of the hospital industry. The traditional role of “public relations” in the hospital setting is being redefined almost daily--and in some cases, the function is being called into question by hospitals, and by hospital systems. This questioning of public relations has come about in response to a host of factors, including: The changes in the marketplace, with a concomitant increase in the emphasis on competition; the advent of the DRG-based Prospective Payment System and other “all payor” or incentive reimbursement schemes, with their increased emphasis on productivity and the bottom line; and the growth in the number of hospital “marketing” departments being created in hospitals of all sizes, many of which assume portions of--or overlap--traditional public relations responsibilities and prerogatives. The trends towards “marketing” are clear evidence of this change. Marketing departments are being created by hospitals to meet the perceived needs of the changing system; in the course of the development of marketing departments, the role of public relations is being re-examined, or even subordinated. Often, this change, at the institutional level, is first realized through the medium (and the control) of advertising, the natural and functional link between the traditional role of public relations (as practiced in the hospital setting) and the emerging role of hospital marketing. The evidence of this change was brought forcefully to my attention through two disparate means. First, in developing the Second Edition of the “Basic Guide to Hospital Public Relations” for the American Society for Hospital Public Relations (published in March, 1984 by American Hospital Publishing), I was asked to add just two new sections to the original format of the First Edition--sections on “marketing” and “advertising.” Neither of these topics had been covered in the 1974 First Edition of the “Basic Guide”; both were deemed worthy of inclusion in the Second Edition. Clearly, these related topics had come to prominence in the hospital field in the ensuing decade between the First and Second Editions. Second, in conducting a formal “Environmental Assessment of the Hospital Industry in Tennessee, 1983-1990” for my (then) employer, the Tennessee Hospital Association, it became clear that advertising, as a tool of public relations and marketing, would have a major impact on the changing face of hospitals through the balance of this decade. As a part of this Environmental Assessment, which was first published in February, 1983, I conducted two national surveys: The first was an anecdotal survey of the leaders of the hospital public relations profession (50 randomly selected members of the leadership of ASHPR and the 54 Affiliated Societies). The results of this informal process were so dramatic that I followed up with a second, a more rigorous, targeted survey of 100 randomly-selected at-large members of ASHPR designed to quantify the first study. While the results of this second survey are reflected in the “Environmental Assessment,” the specific results of this formal direct-mail survey are published here for the first time. They correlate with parallel studies, conducted independently (including the studies published in the April, 1984 issue of Modern Healthcare) that confirm my findings to a high degree. The conclusions I have drawn from this survey, and from extensive reading in the literature (conducted for this Fellowship Project and as research for the “Basic Guide” and the “Environmental Assessment”) were initially presented in April, 1983 in a talk I delivered to the St. Louis Hospital Public Relations Society; and in a different form in a presentation I gave at the fall conference of the Virginia Society for Hospital Public Relations in October, 1983. Both of these presentations generated or attracted substantial further (primarily anecdotal) input into the final research project, and helped me to refine my thesis and conclusions. Both of these presentations were made in substantially different format than this Fellowship Project; while assisting in its development, neither presentation compromised the integrity of the project as “first publication” of these findings and conclusions.
PR And Marketing Books -
PR And Marketing Articles |
Career - Honors
& Awards - Books & Articles -
Fellowship Paper
Credentials & Accomplishments -
FAQ, Opinions, & Observations -
Top 10 -
Contact